this was posted on linkedin, and i'm just going to leave it here.
2020-03-11 01:27:25 ET

p.s. we live in an oligarchy and the deep state is constantly trying to manipulate you. goodnight ✌️


2020-03-11 11:55:55 ET

This dystopia is severely lacking in cyber-elves.

2020-03-11 22:32:28 ET

you are correct!

2020-03-15 13:57:06 ET

Most of these are wrong. Have you actually checked the dates and the numbers or did you just repost?

2020-03-15 22:34:19 ET

i did, yes. this echoes what i've read on numerous doctor's blogs about the topic, and the dates are all accurate.

but, you know, keep watching TV. they're always right about everything. 🤷‍♂️

2020-03-18 04:48:09 ET

How can the coronavirus have a "cure rate" (I think they mean "recovery rate") of 99.7% when the death rate is somewhere around 3%?

SARS appeared in 2002 and went away in 2004. It did not start in 2004.

There's no such term as "contagion factor".

The avian flu that caused the pandemic is called H5N1/09. Why? Because it was 2009 and that's why it's called the 2009 pandemic.

The swine flu is called H1N1/09. Why? Because it was part of the same 2009 pandemic.

Should I keep going?

2020-03-18 04:53:28 ET

MERS was discovered in 2012. The Middle East outbreak was in 2012. The South Korean one was in 2015. And then there was another middle east outbreak in 2018.

The ebola outbreak lasted from 2014-2016.

I could keep going but you already see that the whole thing is blatant propaganda that can't even be bothered to get the basic facts straight.

Like, for example, every year is an election year. Do they mean presidential elections? Because those happen every 4 years, not every 2 years.

2020-03-18 08:04:05 ET

I agree with you LeoZ but wanted to point out one thing.

"How can the coronavirus have a "cure rate" (I think they mean "recovery rate") of 99.7% when the death rate is somewhere around 3%?"

The 99.7% recovery rate is for people under 50 and the ~3% death rate is the total of those infected.

  Return to turboskanker's page